RunSafe Protect
RunSafe Protect disrupts cyber exploits by relocating software functions in memory each time software is run, eliminating 100% of memory safety vulnerabilities to maintain system integrity and security.
Protection for Memory Attacks Targeting Known Vulnerabilities and Zero Days
Organizations are struggling to manage scarce resources due to the constant need to perform software patching, minimize operational disruptions, and enhance security compliance.
RunSafe Protect mitigates cyber exploits through Load-time Function Randomization (LFR), relocating software functions in memory every time the software is run for a unique memory layout that prevents attackers from exploiting memory-based vulnerabilities.
Unlike traditional ASLR, LFR provides more granular protection, without incurring additional runtime performance costs, allowing software to defend itself against both known and unknown vulnerabilities long after the last patch is available.
“From our perspective, adding RunSafe means we have more opportunity to shrink the attack surface and reduce overall risks for our customers since security is now already built into our product.”
Memory Safety Protection
Protect proprietary software from attacks against both known and unknown vulnerabilities.
Quick Implementation and Zero Disruption
Deploy in minutes with zero disruption to your developers and no change in system performance.
Discover how much you can save on embedded security with RunSafe Protect
Maintain System Performance and Functionality
One of the key benefits of RunSafe’s mitigation solution is that it preserves system performance and functionality. The load-time randomization process does not modify the original software code, ensuring that there is no impact on the software’s operational efficiency or functionality. This approach allows organizations to enhance security without sacrificing performance or disrupting existing workflows.
Latest Resources
How to Validate SBOM Accuracy for Embedded C/C++ Projects
If you've ever run an SBOM tool on a C/C++ codebase and gotten results that felt wrong, you're not imagining it. Teams evaluating tools like Black Duck, Syft, Trivy, and FOSSA on embedded projects routinely find that outputs are incomplete, inconsistent, or so noisy...
Questions to Ask When Evaluating SBOM Tools for Embedded C/C++
If you're running a proof of concept on Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) tooling for C/C++, you've probably already discovered that vendor demos don't tell you much. Tools that look capable in a sales presentation frequently fall apart when pointed at a real embedded...
The FDA Is Asking for VEX with SBOMs: Here’s Why That Matters
Key Takeaways: The FDA is asking medical device manufacturers to submit VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange) files alongside SBOMs in some premarket cybersecurity submissions. VEX artifacts document whether known vulnerabilities in SBOM-listed components are...
Try RunSafe Protect Today
RunSafe Protect defends embedded systems by preventing attackers from exploiting memory-based vulnerabilities. Get a demo today.